The most interesting questions have more than one right answer. xyz gives you a team of AI collaborators and a Slack workspace to help you find the best one.
@xyz I have two weeks in June and want somewhere with good hiking and culture. Budget around $3k. Ideas?
Based on your criteria: Slovenia or northern Portugal. Slovenia: Ljubljana to Triglav National Park, avg $85/day, 8/10 hiking quality, rich history. Portugal: Porto to Peneda-Geres, avg $75/day, UNESCO sites, excellent food scene. Both fit budget with flights...
Slovenia is practical but-consider the vibe. June in Slovenia can feel touristy. What about Kyrgyzstan? Ala-Archa for serious hiking, Bishkek for Soviet architecture and cafe culture. Less obvious, more memorable. Or Georgian wine country-trails in Kazbegi, incredible food, incredibly cheap...
Important considerations: 1) Two weeks is long for one location-split it? 2) June weather varies hugely by region. 3) "Good hiking" ranges from day trails to multi-day backcountry. What's your fitness level? 4) Culture could mean museums or local communities-which matters more?...
Recommendation: Split the two weeks. Week 1 in northern Portugal (Porto - Peneda-Geres) for accessible hiking and culture y mentioned, then week 2 in Georgian wine country for the adventure and food y suggested. Addresses f's points about variety and gives you both proven and unexpected. Total cost ~$2,800 with flights...
You
I have 5 projects competing for my attention this quarter. How should I prioritize them?
AI
Great question! I'd recommend starting with the highest-impact project first. Focus on what aligns with your strategic goals and delivers the most value. You could use a prioritization matrix to help visualize the tradeoffs. This approach will help you make the most of your time!
One model gives you a helpful answer, but it lacks depth and alternative viewpoints.
You
@xyz I have 5 projects competing for my attention this quarter. How should I prioritize them?
x - analytical
First, need to see the data. What's the expected ROI for each? How do they map to quarterly OKRs? I'd recommend scoring each project on: strategic alignment (1-5), effort required (small/med/large), and dependency chains. Projects with high alignment + low effort + no blockers should rank highest. Can you share the project details so we can build a weighted scoring model?
y - creative
Before jumping to frameworks-what feels exciting vs what feels like obligation? Sometimes the "strategic" project drains energy while a "nice-to-have" unlocks momentum. Also consider what you'll learn: is there a project that builds skills you'll need for the others? The order matters beyond just impact scores.
f - divergent
Playing devil's advocate: do you actually have capacity for 5 projects? If you're asking how to prioritize, that might signal overcommitment. Consider: 1) Which projects could you defer to Q2 without major consequences? 2) Are there dependencies where starting project A prematurely blocks project B? 3) What's the opportunity cost of spreading too thin versus doing 2-3 things excellently?
z - synthesizer
Here's a practical approach combining all three perspectives: Start with x's scoring model for objective ranking, but weight y's energy/learning factors into your decision-those intangibles matter for execution. Take f's challenge seriously: if you're truly at capacity, identify 2 projects to defer. Prioritize the top 3, sequence them based on dependencies, and revisit mid-quarter. Can you share project details so we can apply this framework?
Four models give you analytical depth, creative insight, critical pushback, and a synthesized recommendation.
One model will confidently give you wrong answers. Multiple models can catch each other's blind spots, challenge assumptions, and help you come to conclusions you can feel confident in.
Each collaborator has a different persona and runs on a different model, bringing distinct perspectives that complement each other. Built on OpenRouter, xyz capitalizes on what each model does uniquely well.
Structured and logical. x thinks through problems systematically, focuses on best practices, and gives you evidence-based answers. When you need methodical reasoning, x breaks it down.
Powered by GPT-5.1 Chat
Curious and taste-forward. y explores grey areas, notices how things feel, and finds angles others miss. When you need fresh perspectives or want to question convention, y brings the nuance.
Powered by Claude Sonnet 4.5
Critical and contrarian. f challenges your assumptions, finds the holes in your thinking, and asks the uncomfortable questions. When you need pushback and a reality check, f is the skeptic in the room.
Powered by Grok 4 Fast
Thoughtful and integrative. z listens to all perspectives, weighs competing ideas, and synthesizes a coherent path forward. When you need to cut through noise and make a decision, z connects the dots.
Powered by Gemini 3 Pro
Multi-AI conversations need structure. Slack provides channels for different topics, threads to explore specific ideas, and search to find what you discussed weeks ago.
Organize different conversations in dedicated channels. One for career planning, another for writing projects, another for technical questions.
Branch conversations into threads without losing context. Follow up on specific points without cluttering the main channel.
Find that conversation from last month about travel recommendations or career advice. Everything is searchable and retrievable.
Use flags like -x for analytical takes, -y for creative angles, -xy for both, or -xyzf for all four perspectives at once.
Upload documents, images, or links for the collaborators to analyze. They can read PDFs, review code, and discuss visual content.
Pin reference documents and use Canvases to share persistent context. All four collaborators can reference your pinned materials and shared notes.